<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Spending $300M for Bandwidth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vidopp.com/2009/11/04/youtube-spending-300m-for-bandwidth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vidopp.com/2009/11/04/youtube-spending-300m-for-bandwidth/</link>
	<description>Where Video Meets Opportunity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:45:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention YouTube Spending $300M for Bandwidth « Vidopp.com Video Contest Community -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://vidopp.com/2009/11/04/youtube-spending-300m-for-bandwidth/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention YouTube Spending $300M for Bandwidth « Vidopp.com Video Contest Community -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vidopp.com/?p=2386#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff Long, appcraft inc.. appcraft inc. said: APPCRAFT-VideoTools: YouTube Spending $300M for Bandwidth: As if it matters to us, YouTube .. http://bit.ly/2nBwMO [...]

[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#039;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#039;t match the comment&#039;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff Long, appcraft inc.. appcraft inc. said: APPCRAFT-VideoTools: YouTube Spending $300M for Bandwidth: As if it matters to us, YouTube .. <a href="http://bit.ly/2nBwMO" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2nBwMO</a> [...]</p>
<p>[WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment&#8217;s server IP (208.74.66.43) doesn&#8217;t match the comment&#8217;s URL host IP (74.112.128.10) and so is spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
